US appeals court halts enforcement of anti-money laundering law.
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is the latest example of federal overreach targeting small businesses.
Introduction:
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is the latest example of federal overreach targeting small businesses under the guise of combating corruption. Introduced by Democratic lawmakers Carolyn Maloney and Sherrod Brown, this controversial legislation forces small businesses to disclose sensitive ownership information to the U.S. government. Passed in 2021, the CTA disproportionately burdens small enterprises while exempting large corporations. This blog post delves into the legal battle surrounding the CTA, its implications for privacy, and how it fits into a broader pattern of federal policies that stifle small businesses.
The Legal Challenge:
The enforcement of the CTA was recently halted by a U.S. appeals court. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated a nationwide injunction after a Texas federal judge ruled that the law likely violates constitutional principles, including the Tenth Amendment. The case, led by the National Federation of Independent Business and several small businesses, highlighted how the CTA intrudes on privacy and unfairly targets smaller enterprises. The Center for Individual Rights, representing the plaintiffs, argued that this law represents an intrusive form of government surveillance. The court will review the substantive constitutional arguments in March, leaving the fate of the CTA uncertain.
What Happened to the Lawmakers Who Sponsored the CTA?
The two key sponsors of the Corporate Transparency Act, Representatives Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), faced significant political consequences for their roles in pushing this legislation. Carolyn Maloney, who served New York’s 12th congressional district, was defeated in the Democratic primary in 2022, losing to Jerry Nadler in a contentious race. Voter dissatisfaction with Maloney’s support for intrusive federal regulations like the CTA likely contributed to her loss. Similarly, Senator Sherrod Brown’s approval ratings declined in Ohio, and he announced in late 2023 that he would not seek re-election in 2024, citing political pressure and mounting criticism from small business advocates.
Small Businesses Bear the Brunt:
One of the CTA’s most glaring flaws is its exemption for large companies. Businesses with over 20 employees, $5 million in annual revenue, and a physical presence in the U.S. are not required to comply. Publicly traded companies and regulated entities like banks are also excluded. This leaves small, often family-owned businesses to shoulder the compliance burden, including hefty fines of up to $10,000 or two years in prison for non-compliance. Meanwhile, large corporations remain unaffected, continuing to exploit loopholes in existing financial regulations.
A Broader Pattern of Stifling Small Business:
The CTA is not the first instance of federal policies disproportionately affecting small businesses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, small businesses faced prolonged closures while large corporations, deemed “essential,” thrived. This recurring pattern suggests a deliberate attempt to centralize economic power, a hallmark of Orwellian tactics. By imposing burdensome regulations like the CTA, the federal government effectively stifles small businesses, reducing competition and eroding the entrepreneurial spirit that defines America.
Such measures often favor large corporations that have the resources to navigate complex regulations while leaving small businesses to struggle with compliance costs. This imbalance creates a monopolistic environment, pushing independent entrepreneurs out of the market and consolidating economic control in the hands of a few powerful entities. This mirrors historical strategies used by totalitarian regimes to weaken the independence of small-scale commerce, ensuring centralized control.
Privacy Concerns:
Beyond the economic impact, the CTA raises serious privacy issues. The law requires businesses to disclose personal details about their beneficial owners, including full names, dates of birth, and identification numbers. This information is stored in a centralized government database, creating a potential target for data breaches. Critics argue that this “quasi-Orwellian” approach could deter individuals from starting businesses, fearing government overreach and loss of privacy.
The database’s creation has drawn comparisons to surveillance measures seen in authoritarian regimes, where governments collect and misuse personal data under the pretense of national security or economic oversight. While proponents of the CTA claim the database is secure, the reality of government data breaches leaves small business owners understandably skeptical.
Existing Laws Already Address Financial Crimes:
Proponents of the CTA argue that it’s necessary to combat money laundering. However, existing laws like the Bank Secrecy Act, USA PATRIOT Act, and Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 already provide robust tools for financial transparency. These laws focus on institutions and transactions, not small business ownership, making the CTA’s sweeping requirements redundant and unnecessary.
Furthermore, the United States has long adhered to international anti-money laundering standards, including those set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The addition of the CTA’s provisions does little to enhance these efforts and instead introduces new burdens for small businesses that are far removed from the sophisticated financial schemes the law purports to target.
Conclusion:
The Corporate Transparency Act represents a dangerous precedent of federal overreach, targeting the backbone of the American economy—small businesses. By exempting large corporations while imposing intrusive regulations on smaller entities, the law undermines both economic fairness and individual privacy. This blatant attempt to stifle small businesses is part of a broader strategy that mirrors tactics used to centralize power during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The defeat of lawmakers like Carolyn Maloney and the withdrawal of Sherrod Brown underscore the growing resistance to policies that prioritize government control over individual freedom and economic opportunity. However, the fight is far from over.
To stay informed about this critical issue and how it might affect your rights, click the link below to follow my Substack. Understanding the CTA’s implications is vital for anyone who values privacy, fairness, and the future of small business in America.